Legal Opinion
Trout v. Frega
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 2, 1996No. 94 C 4335PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I. Background1
Plaintiff Jay M. Trout (“Trout”) filed a one-count Amended Complaint against Defendants Joseph Frega (“Frega”), Joseph Heinrich (“Heinrich”), Robert Steinman (“Steinman”), and Jeffrey Wolf (“Wolf’) (collectively, “Defendants”). Trout asserts a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 which arose out of his arrest on February 26,1993.
On that day, Trout was exercising at the Powerhouse Gym in Geneva, Illinois. Trout is 6'3" and weighs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moss v. SchimpDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022