Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenkins v. Percival

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1998No. 960503Published

1DissentRusson, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that an oral agreement to arbitrate, though unenforceable under the Utah Arbitration Act, can nonetheless be enforced through some other legal theory such as the doctrine of part performance. Furthermore, I cannot agree with the majority that an insurance company can simply submit a third-party claim against its insured to arbitration.

This court has never before addressed the issue whether oral agreements to arbitrate are enforceable in Utah. At common law, oral arbitration agreements were enforceable. See Robert M. Rodman, Commercial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Tobey v. County of BristolU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
  4. Hansen v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Martin v. SchollUtah Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API