Scott v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuekrt, J.
1. Where the entire evidence of a witness is set out in a ground of motion for new trial, and it is apparent from a reading thereof that some of the evidence of the witness is relevant and admis*95sible, this court will not consider objections made in general terms to the entire testimony. Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (106 S. E. 199); City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (92 S. E. 28); American Insurance Company v. Bailey & Musgrove, 6 Ga. App. 424 (65 S. E. 160).
Decided April 8, 1935. Walter S. Billon, Austin T. Walden, for plaintiff in error. Branch & Howard, Thomas B. Branch Jr.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- American Insurance v. Bailey & MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Dillon v. SillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957