Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1935No. 24607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuekrt, J.

1. Where the entire evidence of a witness is set out in a ground of motion for new trial, and it is apparent from a reading thereof that some of the evidence of the witness is relevant and admis*95sible, this court will not consider objections made in general terms to the entire testimony. Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (106 S. E. 199); City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (92 S. E. 28); American Insurance Company v. Bailey & Musgrove, 6 Ga. App. 424 (65 S. E. 160).

Decided April 8, 1935. Walter S. Billon, Austin T. Walden, for plaintiff in error. Branch & Howard, Thomas B. Branch Jr.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. American Insurance v. Bailey & MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Dillon v. SillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API