Legal Opinion

B. Shackman & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 2, 1961No. 66106; protests 59/13629, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The protests enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been limited to the merchandise identified on the invoices as “No. 3518” and generally described as old-timer sets. Classification thereof was under the provision for toys, not specially provided for, in paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, carrying a duty assessment at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem.

Tariff classification of merchandise as toys is controlled by statutory definition, set forth in paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as follows:

Par. 1513. * * *…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API