Legal Opinion

Citizens & Southern Bank v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1918No. 9094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Affidavit of illegality of execution; from Richmond superior court*—Judge H. C. Hammond. June 23, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

This case giróse on an affidavit of illegality, in which it was alleged that a certain execution issued from the superior court of Richmond county “in favor of The Citizens & Southern Bank against the Irish-American Bank, maker-, and Patrick Armstrong, as surety,” and levied by the, sheriff upon certain described property of Armstrong, was proceeding illegally for the reason that Armstrong had paid the balance in full due on the execution. The bill of exceptions sets out the issues to be_ determined as follows: “Plaintiff, Patrick Armstrong,- set up in his affidavit of illegality that The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern Bank v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Kyle v. Chattahoochee National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Atkins v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Federal Land Bank v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Federal Land Bank v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. WoodbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API