Legal Opinion

Bowlin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 27, 1991No. A-3677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Veronica Bowlin was convicted of refusal to submit to a breath test, AS 28.35.031(a) and AS 28.35.032(f), following a jury trial in the district court at Palmer. The main issue at trial was whether Bowlin, who has asthma, was physically capable of blowing enough air into the Intoximeter machine to trigger the mechanism and run the breath test. The State’s theory of the case was that Bowlin had willfully refused to blow enough air into the machine to activate the test. Bowlin testified that she had tried several times to activate the Intoximeter but, because of her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stiles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Taylor v. Reo Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. People v. EnglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PeaseCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  2. Keith Gilbert Ambacher v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
  3. State v. PeaseCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API