Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1988No. 0399-87Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at 30 years.

On direct appeal, appellant argued the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the law concerning good time and parole, inasmuch as the charge is predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. The Court of Appeals rejected appellant’s challenge to Article 37.07, Sec. 4, V.A.C.C.P. Flores v. State, 727 S.W.2d 691 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1987).

In his petition for…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API