Credle-Brown v. Connecticut
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WARREN W. EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Defendants have moved for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling of August 20, 2007 [Doc. # 69], granting in part and denying in *409part defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Defendants have moved for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling regarding count three of the complaint only: plaintiffs claims of retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the employee defendants in their individual capacities. The Court did not dismiss this claim.
Defendants argue that the Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Brendan Gilmore v. Shearson/american Express Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Babelito, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canzoneri v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Pruco Life Insurance v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- Howell v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson HoleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Streets v. MangenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025