Lausman v. Drahos
Nebraska Supreme Court
This was a re-hearing of the case reported in 8 Neb., 457, to which reference may be made for any further statement beyond that contained in the following opinion. cited Mattis v. Robinson, 1 Neb., 1. United States v. Duncan, 4 McLean, 607. cited Weichselbaum v. Curlett, 20 Kan., 709. Bettisin v. Budd, 17 Ark., 546. Jackson v. Rowland, 6 Wend., 666. Ferguson v. Ftter, 21 Ark., 160. Taylor’s Land and Ten., see. 705.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This ease was before the court in 1879, and is reported in 8 Neb., 457. The plaintiff moves for a rehearing upon the ground that Sonnenschein was the tenant of the plaintiff at the time he purchased the property in question, and that therefore he could not acquire an adverse title as against his lessor. No stress was laid upon this point in the former argument of the case, nor is the petition framed for the particular purpose-of seeking to redeem from Drahos and Sonnenschein, the particular object aimed at being to require Mrs. Parrat to exhaust the other mortgaged *173property…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thrall v. Omaha Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Dunn v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Mattis v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Lausman v. DrahosNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pickett v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Hurt v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Card v. DeansNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Schields v. HorbachNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Macumber v. GillettNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.