Legal Opinion
Moore v. Wells Fargo Construction
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 2009No. 84A04-0808-CV-477PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Richard Moore appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Construction ("Wells Fargo"), formerly known as The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. ("CIT"), on its complaint 1 to recover a deficiency owed under a personal guaranty. Moore raises two issues for review:
1. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court's finding that Wells Fargo conducted the sale of a repossessed excavator in a commercially reasonable fashion.
Whether Wells Fargo provided adequate notice to Moore of the sale of the excavator.
We affirm.
FACTS…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Zollman v. Geneva Leasing Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Orme v. Estate of KruwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dick Corp. v. GeigerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vanek v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bitler Investment Venture II, LLC v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Bitler Investment Venture II, LLC v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Moore v. Wells Fargo ConstructionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- DIXON v. NATIONAL HOT ROD ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Moore v. Wells FargoIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.