Legal Opinion

Moore v. Wells Fargo Construction

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2009No. 84A04-0808-CV-477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

NAJAM, Judge.

Moore has filed a petition for rehearing, asking us to reconsider our holding that Moore waived the argument that CIT'"s sale of the Excavator was not conducted in a commercially reasonable manner. In particular, Moore argues that he was statutorily barred from waiving his right to a commercially reasonable sale of collateral. 1 Although Moore did not directly or indirectly make this argument in his Appellant's Brief, on review we agree with Moore that, under the Uniform Commercial Code, he could not have waived the right to a commercially reasonable sale of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Wells Fargo ConstructionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Wells FargoIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API