Legal Opinion

Brock v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1971No. 1 CA-CIV 1552Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

Defendant-appellants appeal from a judgment entered against them by the trial court. Although the appeal raises substantial procedural and substantive questions concerning the propriety of the judgment, no answering brief has been filed herein by appellees. In view of the fact that in our opinion the questions raised present debatable issues, we treat appellee’s failure to file briefs as constituting a confession of error. Parrish v. Parrish, 14 Ariz.App. 584, 485 P.2d 573 (filed June 7, 1971); National Exhibition Co. v. Marx, 9 Ariz. App. 482, 453 P.2d 993 (1969).

The trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Exhibition Company v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Parrish v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API