Legal Opinion

Great Southwest Fire Insurance v. H. v. Corp.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1983No. 8044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

Defendants-Appellants H. V. Corporation, Yun Hee Im, and Su Duk Kim (appellants) appeal the summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company (Great Southwest) that Great Southwest has no insurance coverage for and no duty to defend H. V. Corporation and Yun Hee Im in a suit against them by Su Duk Kim. As to this appeal, we reverse.

Appellants also appeal the denial of their cross-motion for summary judgment that there is coverage and Great Southwest has a duty to defend. As to this appeal, we affirm.

The dispositive issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Shee v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Crawford v. Ranger Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PoomaihealaniDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
  2. Su Duk Kim v. H. v. Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Essex Ins. Co. v. EdralinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API