Great Southwest Fire Insurance v. H. v. Corp.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BURNS, C.J.
Defendants-Appellants H. V. Corporation, Yun Hee Im, and Su Duk Kim (appellants) appeal the summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company (Great Southwest) that Great Southwest has no insurance coverage for and no duty to defend H. V. Corporation and Yun Hee Im in a suit against them by Su Duk Kim. As to this appeal, we reverse.
Appellants also appeal the denial of their cross-motion for summary judgment that there is coverage and Great Southwest has a duty to defend. As to this appeal, we affirm.
The dispositive issue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Shee v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
- Crawford v. Ranger Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PoomaihealaniDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
- Su Duk Kim v. H. v. Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- Essex Ins. Co. v. EdralinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997