Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jackson v. Nation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1908No. 15,772PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

’The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This is an action in quo warranto to ■oust the defendant from exercising the duties of judge ■of the city court of Chanute, on the ground that the *395act creating that court is in violation of the constitution. The act in question is chapter 179 of the Laws of 1907, entitled as follows:

“An act creating a court in the city of Chanute, Neosho county, Kansas, defining the jurisdiction thereof, providing officers therefor and defining their powers and duties, and limiting the jurisdiction of the justices of the peace of said city.”

The act purports…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. In re GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Chesney v. McClintockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Deng v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramsey v. DemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Gustafson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Howard v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. McDougle-Craig Co. v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API