Legal Opinion

Hoeft v. Eide

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 12, 2018No. 0:17-cv-02526Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Richard Hoeft, Plaintiff, v. ORDER Civil No. 17-2526 (MJD/LIB) Nathan Eide, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, pro se. Jay T. Squires and Michael J. Ervin, Rupp, Anderson, Squires & Waldspurger, P.A., Counsel for Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ I. Introduction The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated October 25, 2018. II. Discussion A. Background Plaintiff, a Wisconsin resident, purchased numerous timber…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Minnesota v. HoevenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API