Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Davila

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1977No. 8718PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

In this action arising from the collision of vehicles, it is questioned whether a defendant is entitled to invoke the doctrine of imminent peril. We hold that he is not and that the imminent peril instruction given in this cause on behalf of a defendant was harmful. Reversed and remanded.

An abbreviated statement suffices. While proceeding south on U.S. Highway 87 a few miles north of Lubbock, Texas, Clayton Sanders allegedly lost control óf a For-shage Trucking Company truck tractor and trailer he was operating. To avoid a collision with Sanders’ vehicle, Terry David McAfee,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. BernerTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Del Bosque v. Heitmann Bering-Cortes CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ruiz v. FlexonicsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hightower v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Davila v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sanders v. DavilaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Sanchez v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API