Sanders v. Davila
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
In this action arising from the collision of vehicles, it is questioned whether a defendant is entitled to invoke the doctrine of imminent peril. We hold that he is not and that the imminent peril instruction given in this cause on behalf of a defendant was harmful. Reversed and remanded.
An abbreviated statement suffices. While proceeding south on U.S. Highway 87 a few miles north of Lubbock, Texas, Clayton Sanders allegedly lost control óf a For-shage Trucking Company truck tractor and trailer he was operating. To avoid a collision with Sanders’ vehicle, Terry David McAfee,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yarborough v. BernerTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Del Bosque v. Heitmann Bering-Cortes CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Ruiz v. FlexonicsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hightower v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Davila v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Sanders v. DavilaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Sanchez v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.