Legal Opinion
Mark Ruff, et al. v. Jackson Township, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 24, 2026No. 2:23-cv-02916Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Mark Ruff, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:23-cv-2916 Vv. Judge Michael H. Watson Jackson Township, et al., Magistrate Judge Shimeall Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 76, 77. The motions are fully briefed and ripe for consideration. ECF Nos. 82, 83, 86, 87. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion, ECF No. 76, and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion, ECF No. 77. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS Mark Ruff (“Mr. Ruff’) owns and operates…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.