Legal Opinion

Bogard's Admr. v. Illinois Central Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 6, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

— Affirming.

This action was brought by appellant as administrator of the estate of his deceased infant son, to recover of appellee damages for his death from measles, alleged to have been contracted by the child while a passenger on *650its train, from another passenger in the same coach; it being averred in the petition that this passenger had the measles; that the fact of his having the disease was known to appellee’s conductor in charge of the train, or by the exercise of ordinary ■ care could have been discovered by him, and that notwithstanding such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Louisville & Nashville R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Renfro's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Wood v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Casteel v. American Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Louisville Railway Company v. SaxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Louisville Railway Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Louisville & Interurban Railroad v. GarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API