Legal Opinion

Hodgdon v. Barr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1952No. Docket 4, 5, Calendar 45,194, 45,195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaRpe, J.

Defendants, Stanley M. Barr and Jim Stankye, appeal from 2 judgments in favor of plaintiffs, Catherine Hodgdon and Fred Hodgdon. The judgments are for damages for personal injuries suffered by Catherine Hodgdon in a collision with a taxicab at or near the intersection of Van Dyke and Gratiot avenues in the city of Detroit, on August 27, 1948, about 10:50 a. m.

Gratiot avenue runs in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction, while Van Dyke avenue runs in |a more or less northerly and southerly direction, j There is a traffic light at each corner of the intersecjtion. Yan Dyke avenue has a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rotter v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Scott v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Autry v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Mills v. AB Dick CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Richardson v. GrezeszakMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Tucker v. GilletteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Yeary v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API