Legal Opinion
Lindbloom v. Berkman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1906No. 6116PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered January 20, 1906, in favor of the plaintiffs, after a hearing on the merits before the court without a jury, enjoining the interference by the lessor with the entrance or hallway of a building, and awarding damages.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In May, 1903, by a writing duly executed, the appellants leased to the respondents for a term of three years the second, third, and fourth floors of that certain building located at the comer of Occidental avenue and Washington street in the city of Seattle, to be used as a hotel and rooming house. The lease contained among other conditions the following:
“It is further agreed between the parties hereto that the lessors shall have the right to change, alter, or repair the stairway leading to the premises herein leased, on Occidental avenue, at such time and in such manner as they may desire,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Andrews v. McCutcheonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Johnson-Lieber Co. v. Berlin Machine WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Rice & Hutchins Atlanta Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.