Legal Opinion

State v. Emanuel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 19, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 12338PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Where a trial judge personally investigates a defendant’s background, ex parte, prior to sentencing, must he recuse himself from sentencing? We hold that he must.

This is an appeal by appellant from the judgment of conviction and her presumptive sentence to a term of imprisonment for five years imposed for one count of theft, a class 3 felony, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1801, 13-1802.

Appellant was charged by indictment with eight felony counts. Pursuant to a plea agreement, she pled guilty to count two, theft, a class 3 felony. The victim of the theft was the clerk of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State of Arizona v. Crispin GranadosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. Rock Kelly IngramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. BillupsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. State v. RockwardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API