State v. Emanuel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
Where a trial judge personally investigates a defendant’s background, ex parte, prior to sentencing, must he recuse himself from sentencing? We hold that he must.
This is an appeal by appellant from the judgment of conviction and her presumptive sentence to a term of imprisonment for five years imposed for one count of theft, a class 3 felony, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1801, 13-1802.
Appellant was charged by indictment with eight felony counts. Pursuant to a plea agreement, she pled guilty to count two, theft, a class 3 felony. The victim of the theft was the clerk of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Crispin GranadosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Rock Kelly IngramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. BillupsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. RockwardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.