State of Arizona v. Crispin Granados
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, Crispin Granados was convicted of kidnapping, second-degree burglary, two counts of sexual assault, aggravated assault, and aggravated harassment. On appeal, he argues the trial court displayed judicial bias and erred in some of its evidentiary rulings. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the convictions. State v. Pena, 233 Ariz. 112, ¶ 2, 309 P.3d 936, 938 (App.2013). In September 2010, P.L., at the time approximately seventy-two years old, went…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Alexandra K. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Estes v. contracted/commerceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. BalliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.