Legal Opinion

California ex rel. Harris v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 9, 2012No. Nos. C 10-03084 CW, C 10-03270 CW, C 10-03317 CW, C 10-04482 CWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Docket No. 158, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Docket No. 168.

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

California, Sonoma and Placer Counties, the City of Palm Desert and the Sierra Club have sued the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), its director, the Federal National Housing Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).1 The lawsuits challenge actions by the FHFA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which have thwarted certain federally funded, state and locally administered initiatives…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API