Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 31, 1990No. 890331-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIDSON, Judge:

Defendant Phillip Frederick Cox was convicted by a jury of rape. He argues on *5appeal that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of alleged prior unprosecuted sexual assaults. He also argues that the trial court should have admitted evidence concerning the victim’s reputation in the community for chastity. We reverse.

In the early morning hours of July 16, 1987, defendant went to the victim’s home in Ferron, Utah, and committed the alleged rape. The victim reported the incident to the Emery County Sheriff’s Office later that day.

During the course of investigation,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. BarbourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. GentryUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States v. Alan Neal ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DoportoUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. State v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. People v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API