Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Rank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1984No. Nos. 83-2343, 84-1857PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are a class of former recipients of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) who challenge two aspects of California’s implementation of the so-called Pickle amendment to the Social Security Act (the Act). The district court granted plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction, since made permanent, requiring the California Department of Health Services (DHS) to apply a more liberal standard (the “but for” test) than it had been applying to determine which individuals were entitled to the benefits of the Pickle amendment. The district court, however, refused to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- David A. Gamble v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. HodelDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lynch v. RankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.