Whiteplume v. State

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant, Adolph Francis Whiteplume, appeals his conviction of first degree sexual assault.1 He raises issues concerning his right to speedy trial, the admissibility of testimony allegedly vouching for the alleged victim’s credibility, the admissibility of testimony allegedly expressing an opinion of appellant’s guilt, and the admissibility of hearsay testimony.

We reverse and remand for retrial.

Appellant states the issues in this way:

ISSUE I

Did the trial court err when it failed to dismiss for lack of speedy trial?

ISSUE II

Was the admission of testimony of two of the State's…