Boston Elevated Ry. Co. v. Paul Boyton Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States ■ for the District of Massachusetts; Clarence Hale, Judge. Action at law by the Paul Boyton Company against the Boston • Elevated Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE,' Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought in March, 1899, in the Circuit Court. As originally brought, the plaintiffs in it were the Grace & Hyde Company and the Paul Boyton Company for the Grace & Hyde Company’s use and benefit.' A judgment for the plaintiffs entered February 3, 1900, was reversed on the defendant’s exceptions by this court December 3, 1901, 112 Fed. 279, 50 C. C. A. 239. After the mandate, the declaration was amended by making the Paul Boy-ton Company sole plaintiff, and • also by substituting a single count for the two counts contained in the declaration upon which the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Chapman v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Snow v. . PulitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People ex rel. Hillel Lodge No. 72 v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Bond & Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Mente v. De Witt Rice Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Hardman v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936