State v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence indicating that he had entered into plea negotiations with the arresting officer. This contention is without merit.
During- the cross-examination of defendant, the district attorney asked defendant if he had told Officer Swain that he sold LSD in the past. Defendant denied making the statement but admitted going to Swain’s office the week before trial. The district attorney then asked, “Why did you go there?” Defendant’s objection was overruled and defendant answered, “Well, Mr. Swain was going to make a plea…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. . MoschouresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. SpellmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.