Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Huddleston
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 1, 2014No. 13-CV-302-JTCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN T. CURTIN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
In this action, filed in March 2018, plaintiff Donald McQueen seeks relief pursuant to various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., against attorney Lee Huddleston, doing business as Hud-dleston and Huddleston, Attorneys at Law, based on allegations involving defendant’s attempts to collect on a debt that plaintiff contends was satisfied in 2006. See Item 1. In lieu of answering the complaint, defendant — appearing pro se — moved to dismiss the complaint on various grounds, including improper venue,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerstle v. National Credit Adjusters, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Laboy v. Ontario CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Davenport Bliss v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019