At&T Communications of Maryland, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
I
This case involves a sales and use tax imposed by Maryland on charges made by out-of-state vendors to Maryland consumers of telecommunications information services beginning with the area code “900.” We are asked whether AT&T Communications of Maryland (AT&T), over whose long-distance lines the communications from out-of-state vendors were transmitted to Maryland consumers, was obligated to collect the tax from the Maryland consumers and, failing to have done that, to be responsible for payment of the tax to the Comptroller.
Telephone numbers beginning with the 900 area code are assigned by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Comptroller v. FC-GEN Operations Inv.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Classics Chicago, Inc. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- People's Insurance Counsel Division v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Comptroller v. FC-GEN Operations Inv.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Maryland State Board of Dental Examiners v. TabbCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.