Legal Opinion

East Hill Coal & Supply Co. v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

The petition in this case attempts to state an action in equity. It recites the ownership of the property, its location, value, and use'; also the ordinance and amendment. It charges bad faith on the part of council in enacting the amendment ; that the ordinance is unconstitutional, in that it provides that it shall take effect on the action and in the discretion of seventy-five per cent of the property owners of certain city squares; that the taking effect of the ordinance is thereby vested in a group of people other than the city council; and that said amendment discriminates against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yutze v. CopelanOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API