Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption/Guardianship Nos. J9610436 & J9711031

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 16, 2002No. 58, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

Prior to a termination of parental rights, the parent and perhaps the child have fundamental federal and state constitutional rights to the maintenance of the parent/child relationship. This relationship, absent constitutional amendments, cannot be unreasonably abrogated by federal or state statutes, federal or state regulations, administrative practices, by the need to qualify for federal or state funds, or by the “safer course doctrine.” These rights are the same where parents or children are alleged to be disabled. Under our Constitutions, the poor and the disabled are no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Baker v. Marion County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McGill v. Southwark Realty Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In Re Blessen H.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API