Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras-Gonzales

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2008No. 33700PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Edwin Contreras-Gonzales appeals his conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine. He challenges the district court’s partial denial of his motion to suppress evidence, the admission at trial of evidence of a chemical analysis determining that a substance found by the police was methamphetamine, and prosecutorial misconduct in the State’s opening statement and closing argument.

I

BACKGROUND

Seventeen-year-old Contreras-Gonzales and two young adult males were arrested in a Lewiston motel room in March of 2004, where police found approximately one and one-half pounds of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Dustin Thomas ArmstrongIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API