Legal Opinion

United States v. Berlin Acey Odom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1970No. 24494PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Odom was found guilty by a jury of violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. Odom’s sole defense at trial was temporary insanity during the critical time of interstate transportation. Odom’s primary claim on appeal, where he is now represented by counsel, is that he should not have been permitted to act as his own counsel at trial. We find no merit to this and other claims of error.

Prior to the start of the trial, and while Odom was still represented by counsel, a hearing was held before the court on the issue of Odom’s competency to stand trial and to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richard Erwin Sauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Aaron Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Lanier Allison Ramer v. United States of America, Eugene Richard Church v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. Erick Orlando Locks v. G.W. Sumner, Warden, California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Andrews Bruce CampbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API