Legal Opinion

Erick Orlando Locks v. G.W. Sumner, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1983No. 82-5508PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Erick Locks appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus. He argues that his California conviction on two counts of murder is constitutionally tainted for three reasons: (1) The state trial judge improperly asked the jury foreman about the results of the jury’s balloting; (2) his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by the refusal of the trial judge to appoint advisory counsel; and (3) the trial court failed to suppress illegally seized evidence, firm. We af-

I. BACKGROUND

In 1976, Locks pled not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API