Erick Orlando Locks v. G.W. Sumner, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Erick Locks appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus. He argues that his California conviction on two counts of murder is constitutionally tainted for three reasons: (1) The state trial judge improperly asked the jury foreman about the results of the jury’s balloting; (2) his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by the refusal of the trial judge to appoint advisory counsel; and (3) the trial court failed to suppress illegally seized evidence, firm. We af-
I. BACKGROUND
In 1976, Locks pled not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.