Legal Opinion
United States v. Zack O'Farrell Hastings
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1978No. 78-1116PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Zack O’Farrell Hastings appeals from his conviction by a jury. 1 He was found guilty of transferring counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473, as charged in Count 1 of a four-count indictment, and of counterfeiting obligations of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471, as charged in Count 3 of the indictment. On appeal Hastings asserts four claims of error: denial of his motion to sever the counts of the indictment and grant separate trials on each count; restricting his cross-examination of government witnesses James Ronnie Jackson and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Leroy HayesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Haskell Edward Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Donald R. Nance, Ii, and Thomas N. TilestonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Willard Richard SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Jackie PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Richard J. RabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Willard Crimm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Daniels v. LoizzoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.