Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Loizzo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 1997No. 87 Civ. 6024(MJL)PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion in limine of Plaintiff William Daniels (“Plaintiff’), pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 403, 404, 608, and 609 to exclude his prior criminal history at trial. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On July 6, 1987, defendant police officers Leonard Loizzo and Daniel Fisher (“Officer Defendants”) arrested Plaintiff, charging him with criminal possession of a weapon, reckless endangerment, and assault. Plaintiff was later acquitted by a jury of these charges.
In this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Leroy HayesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Jean-Laurent v. HennessyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Walker v. SchultDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Schultz v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.