Legal Opinion
Fimbel v. DeClark
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 1998No. 71A03-9707-CV-259PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Ronald and Patricia Fimbel appeal from a judgment in favor of Thomas and Joan DeC-lark and Gena Logli (“DeClarks”). The trial court concluded that the DeClarks were entitled to rescission of the contract for the purchase of real estate from the Fimbels, including the return of the contract price and damages associated with the purchase of the real estate. On appeal, the Fimbels contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding that they fraudulently misrepresented the suitability of the real estate for home construction.
We affirm.
Our test for sufficiency of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Theis v. HeuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Adoptive Parents of M.L v. v. WilkensIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Fleetwood Corp. v. MirichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Heather N. Kesling v. Hubler Nissan, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
- American United Life Insurance Co. v. DouglasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Tracy v. MorellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lei Shi v. Cecilia YiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.