Heather N. Kesling v. Hubler Nissan, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSH, Justice.
An auto dealership’s advertisement of an inexpensive used car as a “Sporty Car at a Great Value Price,” is textbook puffery— not actionable as deception or fraud, because a reasonable buyer could not take it as a warranty about the car’s performance or safety characteristics. But when the dealer has inspected the car and should know it has serious problems, answering a buyer’s question about why it idled rough ly by claiming that it “would just need a tune-up” may be actionable as fraud. We therefore hold that the buyer’s fraud claim survives summary judgment, even though her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Beverly Zylstra v. DRV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Pain Center of SE Indiana, LLC v. Origin Healthcare Solutions LLCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Wysocki v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Evansville Courier & Press and Rita Ward v. Vanderburgh County Health DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.