Legal Opinion

Heather N. Kesling v. Hubler Nissan, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2013No. 49S02-1302-CT-89PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Justice.

An auto dealership’s advertisement of an inexpensive used car as a “Sporty Car at a Great Value Price,” is textbook puffery— not actionable as deception or fraud, because a reasonable buyer could not take it as a warranty about the car’s performance or safety characteristics. But when the dealer has inspected the car and should know it has serious problems, answering a buyer’s question about why it idled rough ly by claiming that it “would just need a tune-up” may be actionable as fraud. We therefore hold that the buyer’s fraud claim survives summary judgment, even though her…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Beverly Zylstra v. DRV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Pain Center of SE Indiana, LLC v. Origin Healthcare Solutions LLCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Wysocki v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Evansville Courier & Press and Rita Ward v. Vanderburgh County Health DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API