Legal Opinion

Carlton Fields, P.A. v. LoCascio

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 2011No. Nos. 3D10-106, 3D10-130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, J.

This is an appeal by a law firm, Carlton Fields, from two orders subordinating its judgment for attorney’s fees and costs payable by its client to a. later-entered judgment for damages against that client in a separate case. Finding that there is no basis to apply the equitable subordination doctrine, we reverse the orders.

Edward S. LoCascio (Father) was accused, and later convicted, of murdering his wife in 2001. The couple had a son, appellee Edward J. LoCascio (Son). Beginning in 2002, Carlton Fields represented the Father in the probate proceedings regarding his late wife’s estate.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB (In Re Toy King Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
  4. LoCascio v. SharpeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. v. LocascioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API