Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Millsap

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1934No. 7118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The action is for breach of covenants of warranty and against incumbrances in a deed Kinney made to plaintiff. The claim is that Poliak’s successful assertion that Kinney’s apparent title was only for the purposes of security, and that he held it subject to Poliak’s right to redeem, had broken them. The defenses are that there has been no real eviction, and therefore no breach of the warranty covenant, and only a nominal breach of that against incumbrances. Specifically, it is claimed that Millsap brought about his own eviction, was himself the cause of any damage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rancho Bonito Land & Live Stock Co. v. NorthTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hamilton v. FarmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Tuggle v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Congregation of Sisters of Perpetual Adoration v. JaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. FontenotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API