Legal Opinion

Tuggle v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for breach of warranty. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. January term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Presiding Justice.

Omitting immaterial matters, the facts of this case are as-' follows; William Hamilton, G. B. Hamilton and J. S.. *293■James, on November 7, 1883, sold two town lots to J. E. Henley, warranting the 'tilfcle to Mm, 'Ms heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, in fee simple. On September 21, 1886, Henley, in pursuance of -a oomtrlacit of sale previously made, conveyed the property to J. T. Tuggle, G. D. Stone and "W. B. Embry. Eebruary 6, 1888, Embry sold and conveyed his undivided interest in the premises to Tuggle and Stone. In November, 1884, E. S. Langmade, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langmade v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kinney v. MillsapCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Daniels v. Howe Law Firm, P.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API