Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 25, 1981No. 57761PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar. Respondent petitions for review of the report of referee, arguing that it is, in various portions, deficient, erroneous, unlawful, unjustified, and improper.

The complaint filed by the bar contended that respondent, who practices law in Micronesia, represented three defendants in a criminal case; that in the course of said representation, respondent interviewed three government witnesses who had been promised immunity in exchange for testimony damaging to respondent’s clients; that respondent advised the three witnesses…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BrigmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. The Florida Bar v. MeserveSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Florida Bar v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Florida Bar v. ShemwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Florida Bar v. LehrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API