Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Brigman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1975No. 46177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

307 So.2d 161 (1975)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

E. Paul BRIGMAN, Respondent.

No. 46177.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 15, 1975.

Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, Ronald A. Harbert and F. Hartzelle Baker, Orlando, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Paul E. Brigman, in pro per.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against E. Paul Brigman is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of the Referee. The Referee's report and record of the proceedings were duly filed with this Court pursuant to Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. Respondent has not…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BrigmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Florida Bar v. AbramsSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Florida Bar v. BrigmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API