Farrow v. Work
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Cowt, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by Nathaniel E. Work against Martin T. Earrow. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
October 16, 1905, Eugene Walker and Dinah Walker, the latter a Seminole freedwoman, executed and delivered to E. S. Billington a warranty deed to 80 acres of land, located in Seminole county, and constituting a part of the allotment of the latter. The deed was of the usual form, and recited a consideration of $598.30. On the 20th day of March, 1906, said E. S. Billington, joined by his wife, Stella, executed a warranty deed to said land to the plaintiff in error, Earrow, which deed recited á cash consideration of $605. Thereafter, and during the month of May, 1906, said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Powers v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hope v. BourlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Locust at Al. v. CaruthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Exchange Bank of Perry v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- McKean v. McLeodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Harn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Orton v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Penney v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.