Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1977No. 7728SC649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in revoking his probation based upon the unsigned, unverified violation report of the probation officer and cites as authority State v. Thomas, 236 N.C. 196, 72 S.E. 2d 525 (1952). In Thomas, the probation revocation was based solely upon the defendant’s plea of nolo contendere to charges amounting to a violation of the condition of his probation judgment, evidence of this plea appearing in the unverified report of the probation officer. Neither the defendant nor the probation officer presented other evidence at the hearing. The Court held that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API