Legal Opinion
Quarles v. Remington Arms, Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 11, 1994No. Civ. No. 5-89-568 (WWE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff John Quarles, Jr., brought this action against his former employer, defendant Remington Arms, Co. (“Remington”), and his alleged collective bargaining representative, defendant United Retail and .Industrial Union, Local No. 282, AFL-CIO (“Local 282”), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiff additionally claims that Local 282 breached its duty of fair representation and tor-tiously…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenier v. PACE, LOCAL NO. 1188District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Burns v. American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021