Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Schenck

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

This action was brought by a stockholder in his representative capacity against the officers and directors of Loew’s Incorporated, to compel defendants, directors of the corporation, to account to the latter for profits received by them in breach of their official duty. In this action another stockholder has interr vened. At the opening of the trial a motion was made on behalf of the defendants to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The motion was denied by me with an opinion (N. Y. L. J., April 21, 1931). The trial then proceeded with plaintiffs introducing their proof. At the close of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  5. Barnes v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Essex Universal Corporation v. Herbert J. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Calvert v. Capital Southwest CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Goode v. PowersArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. TRYON v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Benson v. BraunNew York Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API