Van Deusen v. Ruhtz-Pike Engineering & Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrapser, J.
Huber Bros., Inc., had hired from this defendant, The Ruhtz-Pike Engineering and Construction Corporation, a caterpillar gasoline shovel and operator, to dig and remove certain rock in connection with its general contract. Its agreement was that it was to pay this defendant forty dollars per day for the use of the shovel and operator, plus gas and oil and plus a man to do the oiling.
The intestate, William Van Deusen, was an employee of the general contractor, Huber Bros., Inc. He had been hired at nine-thirty in the morning of January 25, 1932, the day upon which the accident happened. He was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wyllie v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Szczepkowicz v. Khelshek Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Yeoman v. FultonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. KearseNew York Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.