Legal Opinion

Vandall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1969No. 41882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

The offense is passing as true a forged instrument, two prior convictions for felonies less than capital were alleged for enhancement purposes; the penalty life.

The record reflects that on February 8, 1966, while appellant, Joe Vandall, was employed as a porter at Overseas Motor Corporation of Lubbock, some twenty-one numbered checks were found to be missing from the office of Dorothy Hill, the bookkeeper and office manager of the company. An order to stop payment of the checks was made at the Lubbock National Bank. On April 15, 1966, the day appellant left the company,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Crain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Ex Parte ReyesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Moulton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API